ABSTRACT
Optofluidic biosensors have become an important medical diagnostic tool because they allow for rapid, high-sensitivity testing of small samples compared to standard lab testing. For these devices, the practicality of use in a medical setting depends heavily on both the sensitivity of the device and the ease of alignment of passive chips to a light source. This paper uses a model previously validated by comparison to physical devices to compare alignment, power loss, and signal quality for windowed, laser line, and laser spot methods of top-down illumination.
ABSTRACT
Optofluidic flow-through biosensors are being developed for single particle detection, particularly as a tool for pathogen diagnosis. The sensitivity of the biosensor chip depends on design parameters, illumination format (side vs. top), and flow configuration (parabolic, two- and three-dimensional hydrodynamic focused (2DHF and 3DHF)). We study the signal differences between various combinations of these design aspects. Our model is validated against a sample of physical devices. We find that side-illumination with 3DHF produces the strongest and consistent signal, but parabolic flow devices process a sample volume more quickly. Practical matters of optical alignment are also discussed, which may affect design choice.